Postoperative complications after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, assessment using two different data sources.

PURPOSE: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a prevalent disorder, and surgery for LSS is a common procedure. Postoperative complications occur after any surgery and impose costs for society and costs and additional morbidity for patients. Since complications are relatively rare, medical registries of large populations may provide valuable knowledge. However, recording of complications in registries can be incomplete. To better estimate the true prevalence of complications after LSS surgery, we reviewed two different sources of data and recorded complications for a sample of Norwegian LSS patients. METHODS: 474 patients treated surgically for LSS during 2015 and 2016 at four hospitals reported to a national spine registry (NORspine). Postoperative complications were recorded by patients in NORspine, and we cross-referenced complications documented in NORspine with the patients´ electronic patient records (EPR) to re-test the complication rates. We performed descriptive statistics of complication rates using the two different data sources above, and analyzed the association between postoperative complications and clinical outcome with logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean (95%CI) patient age was 66.3 (65.3-67.2) years, and 254 (53.6%) were females. All patients were treated with decompression, and 51 (10.7%) received an additional fusion during the index surgery. Combining the two data sources, we found a total rate for postoperative complications of 22.4%, the NORspine registry reported a complication rate of 15.6%, and the EPR review resulted in a complication rate of 16.0%. However, the types of complications were inconsistent across the two data sources. According to NORspine, the frequency of reoperation within 90 days was 0.9% and according to EPR 3.4%. The rates of wound infection were for NORspine 3.1% and EPR review 2.1%. There was no association between postoperative complication and patient reported outcome. CONCLUSION: Postoperative complications occurred in 22% of LSS patients. The frequency of different postoperative complications differed between the two data sources.

Intraoperative assessment of blood flow using transabdominal ultrasound during laparoscopic surgery of celiac artery compression syndrome.

Surgical treatment of celiac artery (CA) compression syndrome (CACS) is to release the median arcuate ligament (MAL) by removing the abdominal nerve plexus surrounding CA. In laparoscopic surgery of CACS, objective intraoperative assessment of blood flow in CA is highly desirable. We herein demonstrate a case of laparoscopic surgery of CACS with use of intraoperative transabdominal ultrasound. A 52-year-old woman was presented with epigastric pain and vomiting after eating. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography demonstrated significant stenosis at the origin of CA. Doppler study of CA was also performed, and she was diagnosed as CACS. Laparoscopic surgery was performed, and the MAL was divided. And then, Doppler study using intraoperative transabdominal ultrasound confirmed the successful decompression of CA. This patient was discharged on postoperative day 11, and her symptoms was improved. Intraoperative assessment of blood flow in CA using transabdominal ultrasound was a simple and useful method for laparoscopic surgery of CACS.

Hospital cost differences between open and endoscopic lumbar spine decompression surgery.

OBJECTIVE: In recent years, fully endoscopic decompression surgery for degenerative spine disease has become increasingly popular in the US. Although an endoscopic approach has demonstrated some benefits compared with open procedures in randomized controlled trials, the cost of advanced technologies remains contested. The authors evaluated the differences in costs and cost drivers between open and endoscopic decompression surgical procedures performed at a single institution. METHODS: Using associated Current Procedural Terminology codes, the authors identified all open and endoscopic decompression lumbar surgical procedures performed from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2022. Preoperative comorbidities, surgical characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were captured. The costs of index surgery-related readmission for revision, washout, or other complications were included in the index surgery expenses. Associated in-hospital costs were collected; these were reported in comparative percentages with open surgical procedures as the baseline because of an institutional agreement. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: The retrospective search identified 633 open surgical procedures and 195 endoscopic surgical procedures for inclusion. The two patient cohorts were similar, with clinically nonrelevant but statistically significant differences in mean age (open 55.7 years vs endoscopic 59.4 years, p = 0.01) and mean American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class (open 2.3 vs endoscopic 2.4, p = 0.03). Postoperatively, patients who underwent open surgical procedures had significantly longer mean hospital stays (open 1.4 days vs endoscopic 0.7, p < 0.01) and more perioperative complications (open 7.9% of patients vs endoscopic 3.1%, p = 0.02), and they required washout surgical procedures in some cases (open 1.3% vs endoscopic 0%, p = 0.12). The largest cost difference between open and endoscopic surgical procedures was the significantly greater cost of disposable supplies for endoscopic cases (10.1% vs 31.7% of the total cost of open procedures, p < 0.01), and open surgical procedures were generally less costly in total (100.0% vs 115.1%, p < 0.01). In multivariate linear regression, endoscopic surgery was independently associated with greater total costs (standardized beta 15.9%, p < 0.01), although length of hospital stay (standardized beta 34.0%) and readmissions (standardized beta 30.0%, p < 0.01) had larger effects on cost. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic approach was associated with greater total in-hospital costs compared with open procedures. The findings of further cost evaluations, including those of patient-reported outcomes, social cost, and capital costs per procedure type, need to be included in operational and clinical decisions.

Comparison analysis of safety outcomes and the rate of subsequent spinal procedures between interspinous spacer without decompression versus minimally invasive lumbar decompression.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) typically begins with conservative care and progresses to minimally invasive procedures, including interspinous spacer without decompression or fusion (ISD) or minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MILD). This study examined safety outcomes and the rate of subsequent spinal procedures among LSS patients receiving an ISD versus MILD as the first surgical intervention. METHODS: 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files were used to identify patients with an ISD or MILD (first procedure=index date) from 2017 to 2021. ISD and MILD patients were matched 1:1 using propensity score matching based on demographics and clinical characteristics. Safety outcomes and subsequent spinal procedures were captured from index date until end of follow-up. Cox models were used to analyze rates of subsequent surgical interventions, LSS-related interventions, open decompression, fusion, ISD, and MILD. Cox models were used to assess postoperative complications during follow-up and logistic regression to analyze life-threatening complications within 30 days of index procedure. RESULTS: A total of 3682 ISD and 5499 MILD patients were identified. After matching, 3614 from each group were included in the analysis (mean age=74 years, mean follow-up=20.0 months). The risk of undergoing any intervention, LSS-related intervention, open decompression, and MILD were 21%, 28%, 21%, and 81% lower among ISD compared with MILD patients. Multivariate analyses showed no significant differences in the risk of undergoing fusion or ISD, experiencing postoperative complications, or life-threatening complications (all p≥0.241) between the cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: These results showed ISD and MILD procedures have an equivalent safety profile. However, ISDs demonstrated lower rates of open decompression and MILD.

Costs, length of stay and inpatient complications of early surgical decompression after spinal cord injury in a geriatric cohort.

Debate regarding timing of surgical decompression after spinal cord injury continues. Recent evidence indicates that early decompression improves neurological outcomes. However, little investigation has been performed regarding how it affects one's hospitalization in a geriatric cohort. 8,999 cases of traumatic SCI who underwent surgical decompression (2002-2011, age 65 + years) within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were included in univariate and multivariate analyses. Univariate analysis shows that early decompression is more cost effective ($88,564.00 vs $107,849.00, p < 0.0005) and is associated with shorter length of stay (LOS) (8.00 ± 16.15 vs 12.00 ± 15.93 days, p < 0.0005) when compared to late decompression. In multivariate analysis, early decompression continued to be associated with a shorter LOS, though cost was no longer statistically different. Early decompression had less odds of surgical site infection, vasopressor use, decubitus ulcers, but higher odds of cardiac complications, acute renal failure, transfusions and hardware complications. Spinal level of SCI did not affect timing of surgery. Vertebral column fracture did not influence cost or length of stay. In summary, the complex mix of results regarding inpatient complications highlight the innumerable variables and complex decision making that involves surgical treatment of SCI, especially within a susceptible geriatric cohort. However, shorter LOS and lower costs associated with early decompression continue to support its uniform implementation after traumatic SCI.

Incidence and management of dural tears in full-endoscopic unilateral laminotomies for bilateral lumbar decompression.

PURPOSE: To report incidence of dural lacerations in lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (LE-ULBD) and to describe patient outcomes following a novel full-endoscopic bimanual durotomy repair. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively collected database including 5.5 years of single surgeon experience with LE-ULBD. Patients with no durotomy were compared with patients who experienced intraoperative durotomy, including demographics, ASA score, prior surgery, number of levels treated, procedure time, hospital length of stay (LOS), visual analogue scale, perioperative complications, revision surgeries, use of analgesics, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: In total, 13/174 patients (7.5%) undergoing LE-ULBD experienced intraoperative durotomy. No significant differences in demographic, clinical or operative variables were identified between the 2 groups. Sustaining a durotomy increased LOS (p = 0.0019); no differences in perioperative complications or rate of revision surgery were identified. There was no difference in minimally clinically important difference for ODI between groups (65.6% for no durotomy versus 55.6% for durotomy, p = 0.54). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, sustaining a durotomy increased LOS but, with accompanying intraoperative repair, did not significantly affect rate of complications, revision surgery or functional outcomes. Our method of bimanual endoscopic dural repair provides an effective approach for repair of dural lacerations in interlaminar ULBD cases.

Longitudinal Comparative Analysis of Complications and Subsequent Interventions Following Stand-Alone Interspinous Spacers, Open Decompression, or Fusion for Lumbar Stenosis.

INTRODUCTION: For individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), minimally invasive procedures such as an interspinous spacer device without decompression or fusion (ISD) or open surgery (i.e., open decompression or fusion) may relieve symptoms and improve functions when patients fail to respond to conservative therapies. This research compares longitudinal postoperative outcomes and rates of subsequent interventions between LSS patients treated with ISD and those with open decompression or fusion as their first surgical intervention. METHODS: This retrospective, comparative claims analysis identified patients age ≥ 50 years with LSS diagnosis and with a qualifying procedure during 2017-2021 in the Medicare database which includes healthcare encounters in inpatient and outpatient settings. Patients were followed from the qualifying procedure until end of data availability. The outcomes assessed during the follow-up included subsequent surgical interventions, including subsequent fusion and lumbar spine surgeries, long-term complications, and short-term life-threatening events. Additionally, the costs to Medicare during a 3-year follow-up were calculated. Cox proportional hazards, logistic regression, and generalized linear models were used to compare outcomes and costs, adjusted for baseline characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 400,685 patients who received a qualifying procedure were identified (mean age 71.5 years, 50.7% male). Compared to ISD patients, patients receiving open surgery (i.e., decompression and/or fusion) were more likely to have a subsequent fusion [hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.49 (1.17, 1.89)-2.54 (2.00, 3.23)] or other lumbar spine surgery [HR (CI): 3.05 (2.18, 4.27)-5.72 (4.08, 8.02)]. Short-term life-threatening events [odds ratio (CI): 2.42 (2.03, 2.88)-6.36 (5.33, 7.57)] and long-term complications [HR (CI): 1:31 (1.13, 1.52)-2.38 (2.05, 2.75)] were more likely among the open surgery cohorts. Adjusted mean index costs were lowest for decompression alone (US$7001) and highest for fusion alone ($33,868). ISD patients had significantly lower 1-year complication-related costs than all surgery cohorts and lower 3-year all-cause costs than fusion cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: ISD resulted in lower risks of short- and long-term complications and lower long-term costs than open decompression and fusion surgeries as a first surgical intervention for LSS.

Percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression and interspinous spacers for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: A 2-year Medicare Claims Benchmark Study.

OBJECTIVE: This prospective longitudinal study compares outcomes between Medicare beneficiaries receiving percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression (PILD) using the mild® procedure and a control group of patients receiving interspinous spacers for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with neurogenic claudication (NC). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with LSS with NC and treated with either the mild procedure or a spacer were identified in the Medicare claims database. The incidence of harms, the rate of subsequent interventions, and the overall combined rate of harms and subsequent interventions during 2-year follow-up after the index procedure were compared between the two groups and assessed for statistical significance with p = 0.05. RESULTS: The study included 2229 patients in the mild group and 3401 patients who were implanted with interspinous spacers. The rate of harms for those treated with the mild procedure was less than half that of patients implanted with a spacer (5.6% vs. 12.1%, respectively; p < 0.0001) during 2-year follow-up. The rate of subsequent interventions was not significantly different between the two groups (24.9% and 26.1% for the mild and spacer groups, respectively; p = 0.7679). The total rate of harms and subsequent interventions for mild was found to be noninferior to spacers (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive study of real-world Medicare claims data demonstrated a significantly lower rate of harms for the mild procedure compared to interspinous spacers for patients diagnosed with LSS with NC, and a similar rate of subsequent interventions during 2-year follow-up.

What Factors Are Associated With Revision Cubital Tunnel Release Within 3 Years?

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that patient demographics such as age, payer factors such as insurance type, clinical characteristics such as preoperative opioid use, and disease grade but not surgical procedure are associated with revision surgery to treat cubital tunnel syndrome. However, prior studies evaluating factors associated with revision surgery after primary cubital tunnel release have been relatively small and have involved patients from a single institution or included only a single payer. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What percentage of patients who underwent cubital tunnel release underwent revision within 3 years? (2) What factors are associated with revision cubital tunnel release within 3 years of primary cubital tunnel release? METHODS: We identified all adult patients who underwent primary cubital tunnel release from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2017, in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database using Current Procedural Terminology codes. We chose this database because it includes all payers and nearly all facilities in a large geographic area where cubital tunnel release may be performed. We used Current Procedural Terminology modifier codes to determine the laterality of primary and revision procedures. The mean age of the cohort overall was 53 ± 14 years, 43% (8490 of 19,683) were women, and 73% (14,308 of 19,683) were non-Hispanic White. The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database organization does not include a listing of all state residents and thus does not allow for censoring of patients who move out of state. All patients were followed for 3 years. We developed a multivariable hierarchical logistic regression model to model factors independently associated with revision cubital tunnel release within 3 years. Key explanatory variables included age, gender, race or ethnicity, insurance, patient residential location, medical comorbidities, concomitant procedures, whether the procedure was unilateral or bilateral, and year. The model also controlled for facility-level random effects to account for the clustering of observations among these entities. RESULTS: The risk of revision cubital tunnel release within 3 years of the primary procedure was 0.7% (141 of 19,683). The median time to revision cubital tunnel release was 448 days (interquartile range 210 to 861 days). After controlling for patient-level covariates and facility random effects, and compared with their respective counterparts, the odds of revision surgery were higher for patients with workers compensation insurance (odds ratio 2.14 [95% confidence interval 1.38 to 3.32]; p < 0.001), a simultaneous bilateral index procedure (OR 12.26 [95% CI 5.93 to 25.32]; p < 0.001), and those who underwent submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve (OR 2.82 [95% CI 1.35 to 5.89]; p = 0.006). The odds of revision surgery were lower with increasing age (OR 0.79 per 10 years [95% CI 0.69 to 0.91]; p < 0.001) and a concomitant carpal tunnel release (OR 0.66 [95% CI 0.44 to 0.98]; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The risk of revision cubital tunnel release was low. Surgeons should be cautious when performing simultaneous bilateral cubital tunnel release and when performing submuscular transposition in the setting of primary cubital tunnel release. Patients with workers compensation insurance should be informed they are at increased odds for undergoing subsequent revision cubital tunnel release within 3 years. Future work may seek to better understand whether these same effects are seen in other populations. Future work might also evaluate how these and other factors such as disease severity could affect functional outcomes and the trajectory of recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Preoperative assessment of dominant occipital sinus in patients with Chiari malformation type I: anatomical variations and implications for preventing potentially life-threatening surgical complications.

OBJECTIVE: The surgical treatment of Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) frequently involves dural incision at the posterior cranial fossa. In cases of persistent patent occipital sinus (OS), the sinus is usually obliterated and divided. However, there are some patients whose OS is prominent and requires crucial modification of the operative planning to avoid potentially life-threatening massive hemorrhage and disturbance of cerebral venous circulation. In the present study, the anatomical variations of the dominant OS in patients with CM-I were analyzed and the authors attempted to develop treatment recommendations for patients with CM-I with dominant OS. METHODS: The study included 213 patients with CM-I who underwent MR venography (MRV) prior to surgical treatment. OS dominance was assessed using 2D time-of-flight MRV or 3D phase-contrast MRV. Particular attention was paid to the pattern of venous outflow channels. The characteristics of the patients with dominant OS and the surgical outcomes were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Dominant OS was identified in 7 patients (3.3%). The age in those with dominant OS was significantly younger than in those without (p = 0.0202). The incidence of concurrent scoliosis in the patients with dominant OS was significantly higher than in those without (p = 0.0366). All the dominant OSs were found to be of the oblique type. Unilateral oblique OS (OOS) with normal ipsilateral transverse sinus (TS) and hypoplastic contralateral TS was found in 2 patients (0.9%). The authors found 1 patient each (0.5%) who had unilateral OOS with hypoplastic ipsilateral TS and normal contralateral TS, unilateral OOS with bilateral hypoplastic TSs, and bilateral OOSs with bilateral normal TSs. Bilateral OOSs with bilateral hypoplastic TSs were found in 2 patients (0.9%). All these patients had syringomyelia. Instead of performing Y-shaped dural incision and duraplasty, surgical procedures were modified depending on the types of the OOSs to preserve their venous drainage routes. Although massive bleeding from the dominant OS during dural incision occurred in 1 patient, none suffered neurological deterioration. The syrinx volume decreased in all but 1 of the patients postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of the venous drainage pattern using MRV is indispensable for safe surgical treatment in patients with CM-I. The surgical procedure should be modified based on the type of dominant OS to minimize the surgical risks.

A Low-Cost Mobile Training Model for Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery.

AIM: To design a practical, low-cost, and freely mobile training model for biportal endoscopic spine surgery to improve the surgeons? abilities in basic endoscopic skills, including triangulation, two-dimensional visualization, and one-handed control of the instruments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The training model involved three stages: triangulation, drilling, and punching. It was composed of sawbones covered by solid and impenetrable materials (a cardboard box was used), monitor (laptop or mobile phone), and hand tools, including an ear endoscope cameras for mobile phone and laptop, Dremel® style + rotary tool at 22000 rpm, Dremel® 2.0-mm diamond wheel point burr, Kerrison punch, No.11 blade, 18 G spinal needle, and mobile phone holder. RESULTS: The model was set up with easily accessible materials and could be performed everywhere. It can also be used to perform laminotomy on sawbones using a high-speed diamond burr and Kerrison punch under a two-dimensional endoscopic view. CONCLUSION: The training model can be useful in improving the endoscopic skills of all spine surgeons, particularly neurosurgeons and those who have little to no experience in endoscopic procedures. Additionally, it can provide familiarity on two-dimensional endoscopic views and triangulation.

Assessment of outcomes in consecutive patients undergoing dorsal scapular nerve decompression.

OBJECTIVE: Periscapular pain has a broad differential diagnosis. Dorsal scapular neuropathy is part of that differential diagnosis but is often forgotten by clinicians, leading to delayed diagnosis, chronic pain, and potentially worse outcomes. The objective of this study was to describe our method for diagnosis, surgical technique, intraoperative findings, and outcomes in consecutive patients undergoing dorsal scapular nerve (DSN) decompression. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed to compile and describe outcomes for consecutive patients (n = 21) who underwent DSN decompression by a single surgeon during the period between August 2018 and February 2021. The primary outcome was change in visual analog scale (VAS) score for periscapular pain between baseline and 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included change in VAS score for overall pain, change in Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and change in the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (Zung SDS) between baseline and 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients undergoing DSN decompression showed significant improvement in VAS score for periscapular pain between baseline and 6 months postoperatively (mean score 54.0 vs 26.8, respectively; p < 0.001). Fifteen of 21 patients (71%) had a good outcome (score improvement ≥ 20). Disability (as determined by DASH scores) was significantly improved at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The only factor that was predictive of outcome was symptom duration, with longer symptom duration predicting a poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of dorsal scapular neuropathy is associated with significant improvements in pain and disability, and these improvements are durable. Morbidity associated with surgical treatment is low.

Post-operative quadriparesis following posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion: A case-series of incidence, risk factors, and management.

OBJECTIVE: Post-operative quadriparesis following posterior cervical decompression and fusion is a rare but devastating complication. Unless rapidly identified and treated, it can cause permanent injury and disability. Given the sparse literature on this topic we intend to report on its incidence, to identify potential predisposing risk factors, and to discuss management considerations. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of 301 patients who underwent posterior cervical decompressive laminectomies and instrumented fusion performed by the senior author between 2006 and 2020. We describe the clinical courses and interventions for the seven of these 301 patients who developed post-operative quadriparesis. RESULTS: The incidence of post-operative quadriparesis following cervical spine decompressive laminectomies and instrumented fusion was 2.3% (7/301) in our study. The mean time-to-onset was 2 days, and the most common pathology was post-operative hematoma. We did not identify any statistically significant risk factors that predispose patients to post-operative quadriparesis. In our series, the patients with post-operative quadriparesis without profound hypotension who underwent emergent surgical decompression demonstrated improved neurologic outcomes compared to those who underwent interval imaging prior to decompression. CONCLUSION: Post-operative quadriparesis following cervical spine surgery is a catastrophic complication that is poorly reported and under-studied in current literature. In this study, we found a 2.3% incidence of post-operative quadriparesis with no obvious risk factors predisposing patients to this adverse outcome. We advocate that post-operative quadriparesis following cervical spine surgery, in the absence of profound hypotension, warrants emergent surgical site exploration without delay for interval imaging.

Epidemiology, diagnosis and management of Baastrup's disease: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Baastrup's disease (BD) is a common cause of low back pain which is often underdiagnosed. It is characterized by adjacent interspinous processes contact and it can be associated with cystic lesions. The aim of this review was to evaluate the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment options of patients with BD. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The present study is performed according to PRISMA statement. Medline via PubMed and Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library database were searched using the keywords: "Baastrup," "kissing spines," "syndrome," "disease." A total of 35 papers met our inclusion criteria. Full texts were reviewed for demographic, clinical data and treatment. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: 1308 patients were included in the studies. The mean age of the enrolled patients was 59.6 years. The M:F ratio was 1.3:1. Population-based studies demonstrated a decade on decade increase in the incidence. Standard and dynamic flexion-extension radiographs of the lumbar spine were performed in 213 (16.2%) of cases. MRI was performed in 735 patients (56.2%) whereas FDG PET/CT was used to demonstrate BD in 77 included cases (5.9%). CT scan was performed in 574 cases (43.9%). Twenty-six studies reported the treatment choice for a total of 277 patients. Anti-inflammatory drugs and physical therapy were chosen in 99 cases (35.7%). Percutaneous infiltrations and surgical decompression in 80 (28.9%) and 196 (70.7%) patients respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Baastrup's disease is a common cause of low back pain. Proper diagnosis needs for imaging investigations and dynamic flexion-extension radiographs. Conservative and surgical therapies are available but there is a need for randomized clinical trials.

An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Surgical Treatment Methods Used for Cervical Spondylosis.

AIM: To evaluate the preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiological findings of patients treated surgically for cervical spondylosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The patients included in the study (n=32) were divided into three groups according to their preferred surgical approach. These surgical approaches are posterior cervical laminectomy, posterior cervical laminectomy plus fusion, and anterior approach. Then, pre-and postoperative modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Myelopathy (mJOA) scores, Torg- Pavlov ratios measured on direct cervical radiography, and pre-and postoperative lordosis angles were recorded. The data obtained were evaluated statistically. RESULTS: The radiological examinations revealed that the average preoperative Torg-Pavlov ratio was < 1 in 29 patients. The average sagittal spinal canal diameter was 9 mm, and myelomalacia was detected in 25 patients. Postoperative mJOA scores in patients who underwent anterior corpectomy and fusion and posterior laminectomy were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The highest symptomatic recovery rate was found in patients with preoperative neck pain. This finding was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Changes in the postoperative lordosis angles and recovery rates were also observed, depending on the preferred surgical approach. CONCLUSION: If there is no kyphotic deformity or straightening of the cervical lordosis, a posterior laminectomy can be performed to avoid the long-term complications caused by an anterior corpectomy. It should be kept in mind that multi-segment and wide laminectomies may cause instability problems.

The Preoperative Cost of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

PURPOSE: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common condition, with well-defined diagnostic and treatment guidelines. Despite these guidelines, continued variation in care exists, with providers variably using diagnostic tests and nonsurgical treatment modalities prior to surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the variation and cost associated with the diagnosis and nonsurgical treatment of patients prior to undergoing carpal tunnel release. METHODS: We queried the Truven MarketScan database to identify patients who underwent carpal tunnel release from 2010 to 2017. Patients were identified using common current procedural terminology codes and included if they were enrolled in the database for a minimum of 12 months prior to surgery to allow all preoperative data to be captured. All associated current procedural terminology codes during the 1-year preoperative period were refined to codes related to median neuropathy and categorized as office visits, diagnostic imaging (x-ray, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging), electrodiagnostic testing, injections, occupational or physical therapy, durable medical equipment, and preoperative laboratory tests. RESULTS: In total, 378,381 patients were included in the study. A per-patient average cost of $858.74 was spent on preoperative workup and nonsurgical treatment. Electrodiagnostic testing represented 44.6% of the cost, and office visits represented 31.9%. Regarding nonsurgical treatment, 16.1% of the patients received an injection during the 1-year preoperative period, 26.8% received a medical brace, and 6.6% used physical therapy. When analyzed based on age group, the per-patient average cost for patients aged 70 years or older was significantly less than those younger than 70 years ($723.92 vs $878.76). CONCLUSIONS: Despite robust clinical practice guidelines and high volumes, significant variation in presurgical care exists. These data are useful to begin to critically analyze the causes of variation in the diagnosis and treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome and move toward a more effective, efficient, and informed treatment strategy. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic/decision analysis II.

Describing the spine surgery learning curve during the first two years of independent practice.

ABSTRACT: Retrospective cohort studyTo characterize the learning curve of a spine surgeon during the first 2 years of independent practice by comparing to an experienced colleague. To stratify learning curves based on procedure to evaluate the effect of experience on surgical complexity.The learning curve for spine surgery is difficult to quantify, but is useful information for hospital administrators/surgical programs/new graduates, so appropriate expectations and accommodations are considered.Data from a retrospective cohort (2014-2016) were analyzed at a quaternary academic institution servicing a geographically-isolated, mostly rural area. Procedures included anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior cervical decompression and stabilization, single and 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion, lumbar discectomy, and laminectomy. Data related to patient demographics, after-hours surgery, and revision surgery were collected. Operative time was the primary outcome measure, with secondary measures including cerebrospinal fluid leak and early re-operation. Time periods were stratified into 6 month quarters (quarter [Q] 1-Q4), with STATA software used for statistical analysis.There were 626 patients meeting inclusion criteria. The senior surgeon had similar operative times throughout the study. The new surgeon demonstrated a decrease in operative time from Q1 to Q4 (158 minutes-119 minutes, P < .05); however, the mean operative time was shorter for the senior surgeon at 2 years (91 minutes, P < .05). The senior surgeon performed more revision surgeries (odds ratio [OR] 2.5 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-3.6]; P < .001). Posterior interbody fusion times remained longer for the new surgeon, while laminectomy surgery was similar to the senior surgeon by 2 years. There were no differences in rates of cerebrospinal fluid leak (OR 1.2 [95% CI 0.6-2.5]; P > .05), nor reoperation (OR 1.16 [95% CI 0.7-1.9]; P > .05) between surgeons.A significant learning curve exists starting spine practice and likely extends beyond the first 2 years for elective operations.

Lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios for minimally invasive surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis relative to failed medical management compared with total hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis.

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) relative to failed medical management with the cost-effectiveness of hip and knee arthroplasty for matched cohorts of patients with osteoarthritis. Methods: A cohort of patients with DLS undergoing MIS procedures with decompression alone or decompression and instrumented fusion between 2008 and 2014 was matched to cohorts of patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA) and knee OA undergoing total joint replacement. Incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) were calculated from the perspective of the Ontario Ministry of Health, using prospectively collected Short Form-6 Dimension utility data. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 3% and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Sixty-six patients met the inclusion criteria for the DLS cohort (n = 35 for decompression alone), with a minimum follow-up time of 1 year (mean 1.7 yr). The mean age of patients in the DLS cohort was 64.76 years, and 45 patients (68.2%) were female. For each cohort, utility scores improved from baseline to follow-up and the magnitude of the gain did not differ by group. Lifetime ICURs comparing surgical with nonsurgical care were Can$7946/QALY, Can$7104/QALY and Can$5098/QALY for the DLS, knee OA and hip OA cohorts, respectively. Subgroup analysis yielded an increased ICUR for the patients with DLS who underwent decompression and fusion (Can$9870/QALY) compared with that for the patients with DLS who underwent decompression alone (Can$5045/QALY). The rank order of the ICURs by group did not change with deterministic or probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Lifetime ICURs for MIS procedures for DLS are similar to those for total joint replacement. Future research should adopt a societal perspective and potentially capture further economic benefits of MIS procedures.

Contexte: L'objectif de cette étude était de comparer le rapport coût­efficacité de la chirurgie minimalement effractive (CME) chez les patients atteints de spondylolisthésis lombaire dégénératif (SLD) en lien avec un échec de la prise en charge médicale à celui de l'arthroplastie de la hanche et du genou pour des cohortes assorties de patients atteints d'arthrose. Méthodes: Une cohorte de patients atteints de SLD soumis à une CME avec décompression seule ou décompression avec arthrodèse entre 2008 et 2014 a été assortie à des cohortes de patients soumis à une arthroplastie totale pour arthrose de la hanche et du genou. Les rapports coût­utilité différentiels (RCUD) ont été calculés du point de vue du ministère de la Santé de l'Ontario à l'aide des données d'utilité du questionnaire Short Form­6 Dimension recueillies de manière prospective. Les coûts et les années de vie ajustées en fonction de la qualité (AVAQ) ont été actualisés à un taux de 3 % et des analyses de sensibilité ont été effectuées. Résultats: Soixante-six patients répondaient aux critères d'inclusion pour la cohorte SLD (n = 35, décompression seule), avec un suivi d'une durée minimale de 1 an (moyenne 1,7 an). L'âge moyen des gens de la cohorte SLD était de 64,76 ans, et 45 patients (68,2 %) étaient de sexe féminin. Pour chaque cohorte, les scores d'utilité se sont améliorés entre les valeurs de départ et les valeurs de suivi et l'ampleur du gain n'a pas différé entre les groupes. Les RCUD pour la vie entière entre les soins chirurgicaux et non chirurgicaux ont été 7946 $CA/QALY, 7104 $CA/QALY et 5098 $CA/QALY pour les cohortes SLD, arthrose du genou et de la hanche, respectivement. L'analyse de sous-groupes a généré un RCUD accru pour les patients atteints de SLD qui ont subi la décompression avec arthrodèse (9870 $CA/QALY) comparativement à la décompression seule (5045 $CA/QALY). Le classement des RCUD par groupe n'a pas changé en fonction des analyses de sensibilité déterministes ou probabilistes. Conclusion: Les RCUD pour la vie entière associés à la CME dans les cas de SLD sont similaires à ceux de l'arthroplastie totale. Les recherches futures devraient adopter une perspective sociétale et refléter davantage les bienfaits économiques de la CME.

Comparative Assessment of Three Posterior Fossa Decompression Techniques and Evaluation of the Evidence Supporting the Efficacy of Syrinx Shunting and Filum Terminale Sectioning in Chiari Malformation Type I. A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of posterior fossa decompression (PFD), posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD), and posterior fossa decompression with resection of tonsils (PFDRT) in Chiari malformation type I (CMI). Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate the evidence supporting the efficacy of filum terminale sectioning (FTS), syringosubarachnoid shunting (SSS), and syringoperitoneal shunting (SPS) in CMI. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were screened for English-language studies published from inception until August 11, 2020. A total of 3593 studies were identified through the searching process. Fifteen cohort studies were included in the systematic review and network meta-analysis. RESULTS: No studies concerning FTS, SSS, and SPS were found eligible. Therefore, only PFD, PFDD, and PFDRT were compared. PFDD showed significantly higher incidence of complications (relative risk [RR], 3.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.54-5.64) cerebrospinal fluid leak (RR, 9.74; 95% CI, 2.33-40.78) and neurologic deficit (RR, 8.76; 95% CI, 2.08-36.90) than did PFD. Both PFDD and PFDRT achieved higher syringomyelia improvement (RR, 1.23, 95% CI, 1.09-1.39 and RR, 1.32, 95% CI, 1.15-1.51, respectively) and greater clinical improvement (RR, 1.24, 95% CI, 1.10-1.39 and RR, 1.24, 95% CI, 1.08-1.44, respectively) than did PFD. No differences were found between PFDD and PFDRT. CONCLUSIONS: PFDD and PFDRT are superior to PFD, especially in patients with syringomyelia-Chiari complex, because of greater syringomyelia reduction and better clinical improvement. However, PFDD and PFDRT can be considered equally efficient. There is no evidence pleading in favor of SFT, SSS, and SPS over any PFD technique.

Cost-Effectiveness of Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release.

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common upper-extremity nerve compression syndrome. Over 500,000 carpal tunnel release (CTR) procedures are performed in the U.S. yearly. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic CTR (ECTR) versus open CTR (OCTR) using data from published meta-analyses comparing outcomes for ECTR and OCTR. METHODS: We developed a Markov model to examine the cost-effectiveness of OCTR versus ECTR for patients undergoing unilateral CTR in an office setting under local anesthesia and in an operating-room (OR) setting under monitored anesthesia care. The main outcomes were costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). We modeled societal (modeled with a 50-year-old patient) and Medicare payer (modeled with a 65-year-old patient) perspectives, adopting a lifetime time horizon. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs). RESULTS: ECTR resulted in 0.00141 additional QALY compared with OCTR. From a societal perspective, assuming 8.21 fewer days of work missed after ECTR than after OCTR, ECTR cost less across all procedure settings. The results are sensitive to the number of days of work missed following surgery. From a payer perspective, ECTR in the OR (ECTROR) cost $1,872 more than OCTR in the office (OCTRoffice), for an ICER of approximately $1,332,000/QALY. The ECTROR cost $654 more than the OCTROR, for an ICER of $464,000/QALY. The ECTRoffice cost $107 more than the OCTRoffice, for an ICER of $76,000/QALY. From a payer perspective, for a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY, OCTRoffice was preferred over ECTROR in 77% of the PSA iterations. From a societal perspective, ECTROR was preferred over OCTRoffice in 61% of the PSA iterations. CONCLUSIONS: From a societal perspective, ECTR is associated with lower costs as a result of an earlier return to work and leads to higher QALYs. Additional research on return to work is needed to confirm these findings on the basis of contemporary return-to-work practices. From a payer perspective, ECTR is more expensive and is cost-effective only if performed in an office setting under local anesthesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Decision Analysis Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.